![]() ![]() This command lists, for every line in a file. ![]() This will show you all the changes alongside with all your comments. command, sometimes also referred to as annotate command comes in handy. ![]() Show the notes (see git-notes1) that annotate the commit, when showing the commit log message. To install it, clone the repository and in the repository root run: swift build -c release -Xswiftc -static-stdlib cp. It has been tested on a Mac (running macOS 10.14.1), but it should work fine on Linux too. You can apply tags from the command prompt to individual commits. annotate-git-commit is built in Swift 4.2. Each file can have label applied to a different version. Tag your files You can apply labels to a version of one or more files from either Visual Studio or the command prompt. If we want to get a list of commits from before yesterday, we can do so using this command: git log beforeyesterday. You can annotate files to see who changed a line, and when they changed it. Yes, GitHub will be great if you want to navigate source, but if you want to go back in time and check your comments/annotations on a given commit, you just need to search the commit via a git log for example and then, picking the commit id, you can just do git show. We have set a date to filter our commits. Developers will build off of this to add more features and functionality to the project. This commit acts as the starting revision for the project in Git. Do you always do commit -am ? You know that if you type commit without the -m, your default editor will open? Then you can type a first line summary followed by the bible, if you please. For projects that already have some code files written and ready to go, the initial commit usually includes all of those code files in one big chunk. I'm not sure if I'm saying something completely trivial, apologies if I am, but you don't need to do a one-liner commit message every time. Git Blame works very well with WSL but does not work with the web browser based vscode compatible editors. Small commits are good to detect bugs in the future, for example, if you're using git bisect. This will show you all the changes alongside with all your comments. I do commits where I just fix paddings, or expose an API without necessarily coding it. Yes, GitHub will be great if you want to navigate source, but if you want to go back in time and check your comments/annotations on a given commit, you just need to search the commit via a git log for example and then, picking the commit id, you can just do git show .Well, some people might say otherwise but I would keep commits as small and simple as possible so they can be explained in one line.Įven for big features you can generally split them out in smaller changes. You say that "in each commit, several things have been done, and as such, my one-liner commit messages are insufficient to fully explain what is going on.". I think Git offers what you need, not sure how complex your scenario is but my suggestions are the following: I look at git blame (using Annotate as IntelliJ calls it) quite often to figure out reasons for some certain change/implementation logic. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |